
Wild Animal Initiative seeks to advance wild animal welfare science through research, funding, and professional services, with the ultimate goal of improving the lives of wild animals responsibly and at scale.
Wild Animal Initiative is cultivating a scientific field dedicated to wild animal welfare. Animals suffer in the wild from both natural and human causes, and WAI estimates that wild vertebrates alone outnumber farmed vertebrates and humans by a factor of 100—meaning wild animals likely bear an enormous portion of global suffering.
Yet improving wild animal welfare on a large scale requires careful, evidence-based approaches. What helps some animals can harm others, creating unintended consequences when interventions aren't properly researched. Improving welfare is different from conserving species or habitats, so we need scientific research specific to the issue of welfare.
Wild systems are too complicated for any single researcher, lab, or organization to identify responsible solutions. To strengthen the field, WAI makes grants, conducts research, and provides career services to scientists, building a diverse network of researchers, funders, and institutions that can carry this work into the future.
WAI’s mission is “to understand and improve the lives of wild animals.” To that end, WAI:
The impact-focused evaluator Animal Charity Evaluators (ACE) has recommended Wild Animal Initiative after conducting an evaluation of their work highlighting its cost-effectiveness. ACE writes: “Wild Animal Initiative’s work to increase knowledge and skills for animal advocacy is highly promising because it focuses on animal groups and interventions that we consider high priority. While we expect all of our evaluated charities to be excellent examples of effective advocacy, Wild Animal Initiative is exceptional even within that group. Giving to Wild Animal Initiative is an excellent opportunity to support initiatives that create the most positive change for animals.”
We looked into ACE Charity Evaluation program as part of our evaluator investigations, and decided to not currently rely on their charity recommendations. (We did choose to rely on their Movement Grants program, but this is separate from their recommended charities.) We still expect choosing ACE recommended programs to be significantly more impactful than choosing animal welfare programs without an impact-focused evaluation behind them, and we remain open to (some of) ACE's recommendations being among the most cost-effective donation opportunities in animal welfare.